Monday, October 15, 2007

Coulter: Jew hating nazi

I don't understand this. Here is what David Horowitz had to say. (he's jewish, too) It was basically what I thought when I heard it. What's the big deal?

I have received a surprising number of emails from friends basically asking "What are you going to do about Coulter?" This is a reference to her recent comment that she is hoping for the perfection of the Jews. My response is this: what else would a Christian hope for? That's the message of the New Testament: Jesus came to fulfill, complete, perfect the Law. If you're a Christian, that's what you believe. If you don't accompany this belief by burning Jews who refuse to become perfected at the stake why would any Jew have a problem?

Why do some Jews think that Christians should not really believe what they believe while it's okay for Jews to really believe they are God's Chosen People? I don't get it. Whatever happened to the pluralism of ideas? In any case, what I'm going to do about Coulter is finish her latest exhilarating book, If Democrats Had Any Brains They'd Be Republicans, which happens to be a hall of fame of her so-called "over the top" moments that drive leftists crazy. Right on Ann.

Gen Sanchez

I said something similar to this some time ago, and I know somebody didn't like it.

The Washington Post, the AP and others were brutally attacked yesterday by retired General Ricardo Sanchez. He accused them and their political masters of de facto treason, functioning not as journalists, but as lying propagandists bent on advancing Democrat Party power. Desperate to cover up this news before the truth of their conspiracy should be revealed to the American People, they refused to report these charges, and instead rushed to publish and promote his use of the word “nightmare” with regards to Iraq. ( A place the General has not been to in a long time, and a place where he failed to achieve the type of success that General Petraeus is now achieving. )

However, Sanchez did spend a long time watching the press lie about the war in order to support the Dems campaign for Iraq to be perceived by Americans as a defeat. In other words, he watched them do all they could to help the enemy.

The lede of his speech, the main part, was his attack on the MSM’s and Dems’ treason. The MSM hoped to kick up an anti-Bush soundbite sandstorm that would obscure the following words from notice, from ever being covered in the media. The New York Times report makes no mention, no mention whatsoever, of his attacks on them and their ilk.
Read more at PatDollard