I am getting rather tired of all of this blather in the media about what kind of judges Bush should appoint. Last night on Hannity and Colmes there was a woman advocating a moderate, or someone we can all agree on. She says the country is bitterly divided and such a move would be a good one for the nation. This is, of course, utter nonsense.
As Rush Limbaugh noted today on his program, the left are advocating moderates only because it is the only thing they can hope for. Who controls the senate? The House? Who is the president. Hmm. Don't belive any of the "bitterly divided" BS. Whenever the left loses the election, the nation is bitterly divided. This is more nonsense. Bush won overwelmingly, to a degree Clinton never did. If we are going to nominate someone the people want, shouldn't that be a conservative? Why would a moderate be the logical choice? It should be painfully obvious that what America wants right now is a conservative on the bench. Meaning someone who interprets the constitution, not someone who makes laws and bases decisions on personal beliefs. Americans don't want activist judges who step out of their bounds. The left knows they can't win at the ballot box, and thus having everything at stake for getting their ideas in through judges, which I note is not at all how things are supposed to work.
As everyone has been saying do what the people want. Don't listen to the left with their media loudspeaker, appoint someone the people have shown they want on the court. Mr. Bush owes it to his supporters.
No comments:
Post a Comment